Supplemental Sick Leave and Temporary Disability Overlap

Supplemental Sick Leave and Temporary Disability Overlap

Can an Employer Take Credit?

On March 19, 2021, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill 95 into law requiring most California employers to provide up to 80 hours of COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave.  The law went into effect on March 29, 2021 but the requirement applied retroactively to January 1st, 2021.  So, if an employee was eligible, an employer retroactively must pay the COVID-19 supplemental leave when the employee requests it, either orally or in writing.

The mandate is nothing new — last year, 40 hours of supplemental paid sick was required. But SB 95 came late, and, unlike last year, application is retroactive. If temporary disability already was paid, may the employer assert credit?

No Double Payment

It’s clear that the law did not intend to permit double payment. SB 95 provides that an employee subject to a quarantine receives the supplemental paid sick leave (80 hours) if one of various conditions applies. One, for example, is if the employee is told by a doctor or otherwise required by law to stay home because of COVID-19 concerns. Of course, temporary disability is owed in the event of a work-related injury resulting in the employee’s inability to work. Obviously, there’s overlap.

Senate Bill 1159 — the presumption bill of 2020 — states that “If an employee has paid sick leave benefits specifically available in response to COVID-19, those benefits shall be used and exhausted before any temporary disability benefits, benefits. So, if COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave is available for work-related COVID-19 claims, an employer must pay those benefits before temporary disability benefits are paid. If the paid leave is owed, temporary disability will not start until that ends.


The payment priority increases an employer’s exposure.

COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave is paid up to the employee’s regular rate of pay, but capped at $511 per day to an aggregate of $5,110. Temporary disability benefits, in contrast, are paid at two-thirds of an employee’s average weekly earnings up to a statutory weekly maximum of $1,356.31 for injuries on or after Jan. 1, 2021. The beneficiary of this scheme is carriers, who will be relieved of responsibility for payment of temporary disability during the 80-hour period.

An injured worker with COVID-19 who is on doctor’s orders to stay home gets the 80 hours on request. Note that SB 95 specifically requires that a request by the worker be made for this benefit. If there is no request, presumably, the benefit is not owed.

If temporary disability was paid previous to a request for the SB 95 benefit, it seems that the employer would be entitled to a credit for the amount. But the situation manifests differently with insured employers and self-insureds, and there are some complications.

The Insured Employer

When temporary disability has been paid by an insurer, the employer might want to take credit. Can it? There is no definitive guidance. The statute is clear that duplicate payments may not be made, but there are no specific allowances for credit in the language. The employer is obligated to pay the injured worker. Failing to do so may subject it to a Labor Commissioner’s Office complaint and hearing. The employer might protest that it was clearly entitled to reduce the pay, but the response might be that there was a remedy in workers’ compensation.

On seeing the 80 hours paid out, the insurance company would conclude that temporary disability (its responsibility and liability), is not owed during the period in question. It might well seek credit against future benefits. The Labor Commissioner’s Office might see the credit as an entitlement of the insurance carrier, not the employer. The difficulty, of course, is that most COVID-19 cases result in no need for permanent disability, and the appeals board is loath to impose credit obligations on temporary disability or medical benefits. So the applicant indeed might end up with a double recovery. But the employer might decide that it would have had its liability anyway, and does not want to risk the myriad consequences if pay is not made properly

The Self-Insured Employer

Labor Code 4909 allows for the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board to consider application of credit when other payments are made in lieu of temporary disability: “[A]ny such payment, allowance, or benefit may be taken into account by the appeals board in fixing the amount of compensation to be paid.” (Per Labor Code 4650, temporary disability is not allowed when there is a salary continuation plan. Also, credit may be allowed when there is overlap with long- or short-term disability payments, retirement plans, an employer’s benefit plan, etc. The law does not favor the unjust enrichment of a double award, and granting credit for overpayment of temporary disability is routine.

So, may the claims adjuster simply subtract the temporary disability payments from the supplemental sick leave, and pay the remainder? One complication in this regard is that granting credit is at the discretion of the appeals board. The California Code of Regulations, Title 8, section 10555 states that, when a dispute arises as to a credit for any payments or overpayments of benefits pursuant to LC 4909, a petition for credit must be filed. This is a new regulation, and it’s untested — it became effective Jan. 1, 2020.

For adjusters, the requirement is a fly in the ointment. It’s simply not feasible to file a petition in small cases. The majority of applicants are in pro per. Filing a petition requires first filing an application, which is essentially the employer suing itself. The employer is subjected to the possibility of the applicant “lawyering up,” and the expense and inconvenience might render the petition being heard and granted a viable option.

The regulation demands a petition when a “dispute arises.” Perhaps that means any time that the employer wants to take a credit, as it is assumed the employee would disagree. Perhaps it means that if the employee is notified of the credit but does not respond, it is reasonable to assume there is no dispute (Qui silentio consentire — He who is silent gives consent). Or perhaps it means that the applicant has to agree explicitly to the credit, or it will be considered a dispute. There is no way to tell for sure, but at the end of the day, if a claim for credit is made without explicit agreement, a dispute might well be found to exist.

With that said, many claims administrators routinely apply credit for overpayment of temporary disability without resorting to a Petition. There are many levels of awareness about this regulation. Although it is a procedural requirement, there seems to be little substantive harm if it is avoided. Penalties under Labor Code section 5814 are not allowable where the employer has a genuine doubt as to liability. It may indeed be said that genuine doubt exists here.

The real problem is the Audit Unit, which as we know, routinely reviews the claims of all TPAs. Asking around the industry we have confirmed that the Audit Unit does indeed take issue where no Petition is filed before credit is applied. Accordingly, many claims outfits justifiably shy away from a deliberate and systemic application of credit without a Petition. It may well be that many claims organizations should look beyond the issue discussed here and consider this regulation in their general practice.

One solution is to simply ask the applicant to apply the credit. If the applicant agrees, credit may be applied. For the more daring, the applicant may be sent notice of intention to take the credit with a reasonable time to object. Since the supplemental pay is due upon request after March 29th in the next payroll, there may not be time for this. If the applicant does not agree, the only safe course is to file a Petition, where the amounts in question justify the cost and risk.


When retroactive payments are being made and overlapping temporary disability exists:

  1. Recognize that a request must be made before the supplemental sick leave is owed.
  2. If the employer is insured, it might defer claiming credit in favor of its carrier seeking it.
  3. If the employer is self-insured or otherwise fully liable, it’s best to seek the applicant’s agreement to the credit, in writing, before applying it. If the applicant refuses, claim credit and exercise judgment about filing a petition.

SB95 What California Employers Need to Know

SB95 Signed By Governor Newsom

On March 19th, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom signed SB95 expanding the requirement for California employers to provide
80 hours supplemental sick leave to employees affected by COVID-19.  The law took effect immediately but provides employers
with a 10 day window to start providing sick leave. All California employers with more than 25 employees will be affected and
the law applies retroactively to January 1st, 2021.

Following are some of the issues that employers must know about.  You can find the full details of the bill here.

SB95 Supplements Existing Legislation

SB95 does not expand upon existing legislation, it creates a separate bank of leave so even if California employers paid
supplemental sick leave to employees in 2021, they must create new leave banks for eligible employees in 2021.
An employer may not require an employee to use other paid or unpaid time off before the employee uses SB 95 leave.
SB 95’s paid sick leave is in addition to any paid sick leave available pursuant to California’s sick leave law, known as
the Healthy Workplace Healthy Family Act of 2014,

Who is Eligible?

Employees who are not able to work or telework for any of the reasons detailed in the legislation qualify for the paid leave.
No length of service is required to be eligible for leave. Employees may request the leave orally or in writing.  Full time
employees qualify for 80 hours of COIVD-19 supplemental paid sick leave. If an employee is not considered full time,
his or her schedule and length of employment will determine the amount of leave entitlement.

Qualifying for Leave

Qualifying reasons for SB95 are as follows:

  1. The employee is subject to a quarantine or isolation period related to COVID-19 as defined by an order or
    guideline of the state Department of Public Health, the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    (CDC), or a local health officer with jurisdiction over the workplace.
  2. The employee has been advised by a health-care provider to self-quarantine due to concerns related to
  3. The employee is attending an appointment to receive a vaccine for protection against COVID-19.
  4. The employee is experiencing symptoms related to a COVID-19 vaccine that prevents him or her from
    being able to work or telework.
  5. The employee is experiencing symptoms related to COVID-19 and is seeking medical diagnosis.
  6. The employee is caring for a family member who is subject to a quarantine for isolation order or has
    been advised to self-quarantine.
  7. The employee is caring for a child whose school or place of care is closed or otherwise unavailable for
    reasons related to COVID-19.

Compliance Recommendations

Employers are encouraged to take these steps to ensure compliance with the new law:

  1. Educate and train human resources and payroll employees about the new supplemental paid sick leave
    requirements. Employers might want to include in the training the new law’s impact on
    emergency temporary standard (ETS) exclusion pay, as well as the requirement that the employer
    replenish vacation, sick leave, and PTO banks for leave taken since Jan. 1, 2021 for a covered reason.
  2. Direct payroll employees to create or reinstate a separate COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave
    designation on wage statements.
  3. Watch for and post and/or electronically distribute the COVID-19 supplemental sick leave model
    notice the labor commissioner issues.

Read the entire bill here

About IEA

The Insurance Education (IEA) is the leading provider of professional development and training in
workers’ compensation, disability management and risk management.  For full details on all of our
programs and services, visit our website. 

July 1st is Coming – Are You Compliant?

July 1st is just around the corner and now is a great time to think about your compliance requirements.

But getting your hours doesn’t have to be a headache. IEA offers on-demand training options designed to
suit YOUR schedule and your training budget.

On-Demand means you can jump on-board anytime 24/7 and move through your program at your own pace
in plenty of time for your July 1st deadline. No app necessary, simply access courses from your own desktop
or mobile device.

Introduction to Workers’ Compensation (15 Hours)
Comprehensive exploration of the principles and theories of workers’ compensation.
Learn More

Claims Practitioner in Workers’ Compensation
Choose from a range of 24 on-demand modules offering up to 120 hours CE credit.
Learn More

On-Demand Video Series
Recently recorded topical series relating to the ever evolving impact of COVID-19.
Learn More

Not sure about your particular compliance requirements? Here’s a handy download to help you figure it out.

About IEA
IEA is the leading provider of professional development and training in Workers’ Compensation,
Disability Management and Risk management. We offer certificate programs, designations, and
continuing education that sets our students apart as experts in their field. For more information
on our training programs, visit our website.

IEA Launches Newly Updated Disability Management Course

IEA’s CPDM1 Course Newly Updated

IEA’s  has announced the launch of its newly updated CPDM1 Course.

Written in the era of COVID, this curriculum addresses the challenges facing employers in the ever changing landscape
of disability management. With contribution from prominent experts in employment law, disability management, human
resources and disability management, this course offers the mission critical skills needed to address the complex world of
absence and leave.

State-of-the-art Learning Technology

CPDM1 is newly designed to meet best practices in how adults learn most efficiently. The course leverages interactive
on-demand modules combined with weekly live webinars led by subject matter experts. Participants have access to
the latest relevant case studies as well as a discussion forum for real-time response to current topics in the field.

About the CPDM Designation

The Certified Professional in Disability Management (CPDM) is the nation’s foremost designation for professionals
in absence and disability management. Only three courses! Participants move through the courses sequentially to
earn the designation. Graduates of the program possess the mission critical skills needed to develop and implement
an effective and cost-efficient plan that saves money, increases productivity and keeps pace with compliance.

First Course – CPDM1 Starts Feb 25th

The first course in the series, CPDM1 Essentials in Disability Management, starts February 25th. Live webinars take
place weekly on Thursdays from 11:30am-12:30pm PST from February 25th to May 6th, 2021.

Learn More and Enroll

To learn more about the CPDM1 program, visit our webpage, email, or call us at
(800) 655-4432

About IEA

IEA is the leading provider of professional development and training opportunities in disability management,
workers’ compensation, risk management and human resources.  Learn more about us at